At a time when the economic crisis is worsening and the middle class is eroding until it's almost gone from the scene, the Government officially announced its decision to convert in-kind support through the supply card to monetary support after decades when the sugar bag and the oil bottle were the obvious sign of the delivery of support to the eligible decision, which was finally issued, the time of insinuations and leaks, but the question that the simplifications ask before the experts had not been tagged.
The undeniable fact is that during the past years, the way to delete has been reversed, we have witnessed successive waves of deleting large groups of system beneficiaries and official justification has always been one that does not change, but the reality on the ground has completely reversed, rather than broadening the base of the beneficiaries and instead of adding citizens who have grown up and become young people who are in pain of living, and instead of removing the walls from the door.
The real risk of a shift in cash support lies not in the same idea, but in the absence of a spontaneous compensation mechanism. What if commodity prices rise as every month without interruption? Would the Government automatically raise the value of monetary support to keep up with the savage inflation rates? Or would it stop at a fixed number, a vineyard, then leave the citizen to face the market alone without protection?
This is where support shifts from a protection tool to an incalculable and non-juvenated formal subsidy, and the citizen shifts from a beneficiary of guaranteed support to a figure in the detection of price deflation.
The supply card is no longer just "support" in the eyes of the plaintiffs and low-income people. It's turned into an extra room where the poor don't have to have their children.
No one disagrees with the State ' s right to rationalize support and delete the undeserved, which is required by justice and economic logic, but it is also the right of the citizen to be fair and to have justice on the ground, to see his 18-year-old son, to marry and to open up a flat house, and to see his neighbour, who lost his job because of the crisis, has entered the protection system.
Gentlemen, the supply card was a red line that could not be experimented or compromised, and today, after the formal decision, the ball was made on the implementation and guarantees stadium, so that the shift of monetary support would be linked to a transparent, automatic mechanism to keep pace with inflation and constitutional and legal guarantees that would prevent the shift of support to a formal subsidy, lose its value with every wave of invisibility and leave the citizen prey.
To talk the rest.
