One shop ' s refusal to draw the cross on the legacy of a wide state of controversy has prompted some to consider evidence of the collapse of national unity in Egypt and its attachment to a long history of political, intellectual and social transformations, but the quiet reading of reality reveals that there is a great deal of exaggeration in the description and loading of the event more than possible.
Depending on what has been traded, demand has not been normal or spontaneously as close to a test for the shop, in a climate where certain actions are made specifically to generate controversy and proliferation on social media sites. Here the question becomes: has the objective already been to purchase a tortoise, or is a tradeable reality industry and media engagement?
Conversely, no individual conduct or limited commercial decision can be considered as evidence of a comprehensive national crisis; national unity is not measured by a single incident, nor is it broken by an unsuccessful attitude of a shop or employee.
The call for the 1919 revolution and the historical symbolism of the hills with the Cross in this context carries a certain degree of historical simplification. Yes, the 1919 revolution was an important and inspiring national moment in Egyptian history, but it was not an ideal era free from tensions or disagreements.
It is also important to emphasize a fundamental principle in any natural society: no one can force another to do what he does not want, since refraining from such an act does not cause real harm to others; relationships between people are not managed by moral coercion, public pressure or by prosecutions of communication sites, but by mutual respect and freedom of choice.
And it was the best in the shop. — If you correct the incident, — To deal with it simply and without arousing, it would also have been better not to turn the situation into social ambush, the purpose of which is to create controversy and ignite communication sites.
The real problem is not in histories, not in a drawing or symbol, but in the case of polarization, which makes any position immediately convertible into a ideological battle; instead of dealing quietly with individual attitudes, some quickly employ them politically, religiously or in the media, a small incident turns into a symbolic battle around the identity of the whole society.
True national unity is not built by slogans or constant summons of the past, but rather by natural trust among people, calmly, and by the ability to prevent provocation from being transformed into obesity, and to prevent individual errors from becoming a rule of a whole society.
